Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00612
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Whitefield v. Medical Staff et al
as 2:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Whitefield and David Maurice Whitfield
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Sgt. Artis, Sgt. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Southern Trust Mortgage, LLC v. Lowry et al
as 2:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Southern Trust Mortgage, LLC
Defendant:
Ryan Lowry, Anthony Sergi and Nicholas Gills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arden et al v. National Association of Medical Examiners, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00991
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L Arden and Arden Forensics, PC
Defendant:
National Association of Medical Examiners, Inc., Sally Aiken, John Scott Denton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cook v. Stanton et al
as 3:2021cv00538
Plaintiff:
Brent W. Cook
Defendant:
M E Stanton, Detective Gray, Sheriff Alisa Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whittaker v. Gill et al
as 3:2021cv00474
Plaintiff:
William Whittaker
Defendant:
Sgt. Gill, Nurse Winstead, Brittney Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darouse v. Gill et al
as 4:2021cv00094
Plaintiff:
Paul Darouse, Jr. and John Paul Darouse, Jr.
Defendant:
Herbert C. Gill, A. Conrad Bareford, III, Charles R. Carrithers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cason v. Featherston et al
as 4:2021cv00080
Defendant:
Sandra Featherston, Gill Jones and Valerie Goldston
Plaintiff:
Phillip Cason
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
