Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00326
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Holland v. Gary The City of et al
as 2:2010cv00454
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland
Defendant:
Gary The City of, Rudy Clay, Gary City of Chief of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Gill et al
as 1:2010cv00213
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Laura J Gill and Discover Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED CENTRAL BANK v. G & G HOTEL DEVELOPMENT, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00824
Defendant:
CAPITAL CROSSING BANK, DAYS INN WORLDWIDE, INC., FIDELITY BANK OF FLORIDA, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED CENTRAL BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00694
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Allstate Insurance Company v. Contreras et al
as 2:2010cv00181
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company
Defendant:
Daniel Contreras, Raudel Contreras, Martha Robles-Moya and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHULL v. CAST et al
as 1:2010cv00463
Defendant:
WILLIAM R. CAST, PHILIP N. ESKEW, JR., STEPHEN L. FERGUSON and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK H. SHULL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gill v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
Michael J Gill
Defendant:
A Rodriguez, Brian Perez and Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Superintendent
as 3:2010cv00026
Petitioner:
Stanley A Gill
Defendant:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
