Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Gill v. Food Lion LLC
as 7:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Toivania E. Gill
Defendant:
Food Lion LLC. and Food Lion LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Binns v. Coles et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Gregory Binns
Defendant:
SGT. Coles, LT. Riggsby, K9 Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cousins v. Young et al
as 7:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Eugene Ross Cousins
Defendant:
Col. Eric Young, Sgt. Caplinger, Officer O. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hedlund v. Mulheim et al
as 3:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ronald Hedlund and Ronald Hedlund
Defendant:
Matthew Mulheim, Clarke Mercer, Sandra Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Silva v. Felton et al
as 7:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Earl Lewis Silva, Jr.
Defendant:
Major Felton, Mrs. Morton, Sgt. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Artis et al
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
David M. Whitfield
Defendant:
Sgt Artis, Ches. Jail Medical Staff, Sgt Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00612
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
