Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Newell v. Tate et al
as 5:2022cv00277
Plaintiff: Leroy Lee Newell, Jr.
Defendant: DiDymus Tate, Prime Care Health Service, Lt. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00127
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Gill v. Antonelli et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00139
Defendant: State of Maryland, West Virginia, Bryan Antonelli and others
Plaintiff: Raymond Edward Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Coakley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00032
Respondent: Coakley
Petitioner: Raymond Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gill v. Coakley
as 3:2019cv00204
Respondent: Coakley
Petitioner: Raymond Edward Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gill v. United States Parole Commission
as 2:2017cv00151
Plaintiff: Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant: United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gill v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 1:2017cv00203
Plaintiff: Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant: United States Parole Commission and US Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shrader v. State of West Virginia, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv25344
Petitioner: Thomas Shrader
Respondent: State of West Virginia and Audrey Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gill v. Coakley
as 5:2017cv00033
Petitioner: Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent: Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kanode v. Swope, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01530
Plaintiff: Michael J. Kanode, Sr.
Defendant: Derek C. Swope, Scott Ash, Mike L. Gills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?