Cases 41 - 50 of 6,142
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kotevski v. Clinton et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, William Jefferson Clinton, Estate of George H.W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Davis v. Pilot Company et al
as 3:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis
Defendant:
Pilot Company, Hinds County Sheriff Department, Adam L. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DIODATO v. LUCKY et al
as 6:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
GINA DIODATO
Defendant:
SHANNON LUCKY and DONALD LUCKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Gina Fields v. AAA Life Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
Gina Fields
Defendant:
AAA Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Breakers Stony Point Marina, LP v. SV Lola et al
as 7:2024cv02667
Plaintiff:
Breakers Stony Point Marina, LP
Defendant:
Kevin J Bradshaw, Gina A Bradshaw and SV Lola a/k/a Lucky Dog
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
Singleton v. Raimondo
as 24-2218
Plaintiff:
TYRONE SINGLETON
Defendant:
GINA M. RAIMONDO, U.S. Department of Commerce (Bureau of the Census), Agency, Secretary
Rogers v. Blakeman
as 5:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Steven Rogers
Defendant:
Gina Blakeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bessette et al v. First Protective Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
BLAIR & GINA BESSETTE
Defendant:
First Protective Insurance Company d/b/a Frontline Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
