Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01757
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv09794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Amide Beverage Company, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al.
as 4:2024cv01022
Defendant:
GNC Holdings, LLC, The Kroger Company, Costco Wholesale Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Amide Beverage Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC v. AQUA GOLD INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01570
Defendant:
AQUA GOLD INC., SHABBIR HUSSAIN and JOHN DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
WILKINS v. GNC Holdings, LLC
as 2:2024cv05909
Defendant:
GNC Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff:
ANDREW WILKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
WILKINS v. GNC Holdings, LLC
as 2:2024cv05908
Plaintiff:
ANDREW WILKINS
Defendant:
GNC Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Walsh v. GNC Holdings LLC
as 1:2024cv12731
Plaintiff:
Brenna Walsh
Defendant:
GNC Holdings; LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Alondra Espinosa v. GNC Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv09138
Defendant:
GNC Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff:
Alondra Manzo Espinosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC v. ONI DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01279
Petitioner:
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC
Respondent:
ONI DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION and TOTAL NUTRITION CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
