Cases 51 - 60 of 892
City of Philadelphia et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2022mc00049
Plaintiff:
City of Philadelphia, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC and others
City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 0:2022mc00012
Respondent:
Bank of America Corporation
Petitioner:
The City of Philadelphia
Plaintiff:
City of Philadelphia, Mayor of Baltimore, City Council of Baltimore and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
UA Local 13 Pension Fund v. Bumble Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00624
Plaintiff:
UA Local 13 Pension Fund
Defendant:
Bumble Inc., Whitney Wolfe Herd, Anuradha B. Subramanian and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Allison v. Oak Street Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Reginald T. Allison and City of Dearborn Police & Fire Revised Retirement System
Defendant:
Oak Street Health, Inc., Michael Pykosz, Timothy Cook and others
Petitioner:
Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore, Employees Retirement System of the City of Kansas City, Missouri, Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund - Defined Benefit Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Golubowski v. Robinhood Markets, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv09767
Plaintiff:
Philip Golubowski
Defendant:
Robinhood Markets, Inc., Vladimir Tenev, Jason Warnick and others
Petitioner:
Felix Maechler, Leroy Doug Altman, Josh Raborn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Litovich v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-2905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Isabel Litovich, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Holdcraft Marital Trust, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, BofA Securities, Inc. and others
Douvia v. ON24, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv08578
Plaintiff:
James Douvia
Defendant:
ON24, Inc., Sharat Sharan, Steven Vattuone and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
