Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Wrenn v. Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Darrick Edward Wrenn
Defendant:
Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General, Scott Pruitt, Mike Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gomez et al v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00821
Plaintiff:
Sylvia D Gomez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Royal v. Emerson-Gomez et al
as 5:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
Tony Royal
Defendant:
Mary Emerson-Gomez and Edward L Gaylord
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Wrenn v. Pruitt et al
as 5:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Darrick Edward Wrenn
Defendant:
Scott Pruitt, Mike Hunter, John O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yarclay v. Averitt et al
as 5:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Jesse Manquan Yarclay
Defendant:
L Averitt, Dr L Averitt, Ms K Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Morgan et al v. United States et al
as 5:2021cv01030
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan, Earnest Draper, Earnest Moncada and others
Respondent:
United States and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gomez v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2021cv00379
Plaintiff:
Jesette Gomez
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cisneros v. Gomez et al
as 5:2021cv00825
Plaintiff:
Michael V Cisneros
Defendant:
Sheriffs Deputy Gomez and Oklahoma County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wrenn v. Pruitt et al
as 5:2021cv00059
Defendant:
Traylor Rains, Office of the Attorney General, Nicole M Nantois and others
Plaintiff:
Janice Cassandra Wrenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
