Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Kindred v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Herman Kindred
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Erik K. White, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Courthouse News Service v. Gould, et al.
as 4:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Courthouse News Service
Defendant:
Michael Gould, Megan LaVoie and David Trantham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Barnhill et al v. Mid-America Pet Food, L.L.C.
as 5:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Alison Barnhill, Kimberlee Ferris, Jeffrey Gould and others
Defendant:
Mid-America Pet Food, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seguin v. Tyler Technologies, Inc.
as 4:2023cv04562
Plaintiff:
Mary Seguin
Defendant:
Tyler Technologies, Inc., Gero Meyersiek, Barbara Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hafner v. DeLaura et al
as 6:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
Robert Duane Hafner
Defendant:
Unknown DeLaura, Unknown Garcia, Unknown Murdock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00058
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Porter v. Edgeworth et al
as 4:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Jerome Porter
Defendant:
Honorable Jennifer Edgeworth, Amanda Solomon, Baileigh Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Edgeworth et al
as 3:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Jerome Porter
Defendant:
Jennifer Edgeworth, Amanda Solomon, Baileigh Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00035
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
