Cases 21 - 30 of 179
GRAHAM v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2021cv20773
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS W. GRAHAM
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARCUS O. HICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivera v. Warden Akinbayo et al.
as 1:2021cv01737
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Rivera
Defendant:
Warden Akinbayo, Staff Lt. Warren, Staff Lt. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. RUDOVSKY et al
as 2:2021cv02759
Plaintiff:
ROLAND GRAHAM and RONALD GRAHAM
Defendant:
MESSING, FEINBERG & LIN, DILP, DAVID RUDOVSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF VITAL RECORDS
as 2:2021cv00846
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF VITAL RECORDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Joshua Graham v. Mark Rowe, et al
as 21-1053
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK ROWE and CITY OF VINELAND
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA MICHAEL GRAHAM
GRAHAM v. SORBER et al
as 2:2021cv00590
Respondent:
JAIMIE SORBER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and EUGENE A. VITTONE, II
Petitioner:
TERRANCE GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRAHAM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv02851
Plaintiff:
KEVINO GRAHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GRAHAM v. MORGAN et al
as 2:2021cv01831
Defendant:
MICHELLE MORGAN and MARK GARLAND
Plaintiff:
KEVINO GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2021cv00449
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PATRICK HOMER, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PALLIPURATH v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv04567
Defendant:
HAVIS INC., DR. COFFMAN, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M PALLIPURATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
