Cases 21 - 30 of 147
Hardin v. Fuqua et al
as 7:2020cv00232
Defendant:
Ryan Fuqua and Lumberton, City of
Plaintiff:
Graham Keith Hardin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRUMWRIGHT et al v. COLE et al
as 1:2020cv00998
Plaintiff:
Rev. GREGORY B. DRUMWRIGHT, Edith Ann Jones, MELANIE MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
SHERIFF TERRY S. JOHNSON, Chief Mary Kristy Cole, JONATHAN FRANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALLEN et al v. CITY OF GRAHAM, NC et al
as 1:2020cv00997
Defendant:
City of Graham, NC, ALAMANCE COUNTY, SHERIFF TERRY S. JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
Future Alamance, Tabatha Davis, Dejuana Bigelow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DESPAIGNE ZULVETA v. THE BARRETT FIRM, ET AL.
as 1:2019cv00978
Plaintiff:
ARMANDO DESPASAIGNE ZULVETA and ARMANDO DESPAIGNE ZULVETA
Defendant:
THE BARRETT FIRM, ERIK K. ENGLEBARDT, CLAWSON AND STAUBES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Stephans v. Jackson County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2019cv00180
Plaintiff:
Marjorie M. Stephans
Defendant:
Brian Welmon, Jackson County Courthouse, James Clawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00274
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Secretary of the Army
as 5:2017cv00502
Plaintiff:
Jonathan P. Graham
Defendant:
Secretary of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Secretary of the Army
as 5:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Jonathan P. Graham
Defendant:
Secretary of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM V. UNITED STATES ANTI-DOPING AGENCY
as 1:2016cv01025
Plaintiff:
TREVOR GRAHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ANTI-DOPING AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham v. Bernard et al
as 7:2016cv00257
Plaintiff:
Antoine L Graham
Defendant:
Anthony J Bernard , James A Maroldt , Michael A Fike and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
