Cases 31 - 40 of 476
Meany et al v. Atomic Protocol Systems OU et al
as 1:2023cv01582
Plaintiff:
Robert Meany, Graham Dickinson, John Briscoe and others
Defendant:
Atomic Wallet, Konstantin Gladych, Konstantin Gladyshev and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Graham v. Haaland et al
as 6:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Ron Graham
Defendant:
Debra Haaland, Eddie Streater, United States Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mendoza et al v. Douglas et al
as 1:2023cv01230
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mendoza, Raymond Barnett, Terrence McNeal and others
Defendant:
Steven T. Nnjchin, Charles Rettig, United States Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Graham v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, James Paul Lankford, Stephanie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Lankford
as 5:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
James Paul Lankford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Williams
as 5:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
Misty Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Henderson
as 5:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
Michelle Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Irvin
as 5:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
Alicia Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintana v. Utah State Prison, et al
as 23-4064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
UTAH STATE PRISON, FNU SPOTTS, FNU GRAHAM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
