Cases 11 - 20 of 143
Penns v. Harrison County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Vartaurse Carnelous Penns
Defendant:
Harrison County Jail, Troy Peters, James Jones and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penns v. Harrison County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00221
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Unknown Webb, Unknown Chinn, Unknown McCabe and others
Plaintiff:
Vartaurse Carnelous Penns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griggs et al v. Graham
as 3:2021cv00416
Plaintiff:
Mississippi Humanist Association, American Atheists, Inc., L. Kim Gibson and others
Defendant:
Chris Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Sollie et al
as 3:2021cv00379
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Billy Sollie and The State of Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Shalan Montreze Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Graham v. Baptiste et al
as 3:2021cv00360
Defendant:
John Does 1 - 10, Jean Riguad Baptiste, Polusa Transportation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. Baptiste et al
as 3:2021cv00265
Plaintiff:
John Graham
Defendant:
Jean Riguad Baptiste, Polusa Transportation, Inc., Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beasley v. Graham et al
as 3:2020cv00824
Defendant:
Deputy Graham, Sergent Franklin and Sergent K. Johnson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Javondus Montrez Beasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. PAP, LLC
as 2:2020cv00153
Plaintiff:
Shureka Graham
Defendant:
PAP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steele v. Phillips
as 1:2020cv00207
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Steele
Defendant:
Graham T. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. McAlister's Deli et al.
as 3:2020cv00380
Plaintiff:
Shirley Anne Graham
Defendant:
McAlister's Deli, McAlister's, LLC, Restaurant Acquisition Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
