Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jonassen, et al. v. Jacquez, et al.
as 26-3123
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN
Defendant:
I. JACQUEZ, D. SUH, B. CRAY and others
Schottel v. Trump et al
as 4:2025cv01268
Plaintiff:
James W. Schottel
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Chuck Grassley and Mike Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Schottel v. Trump et al
as 4:2025cv01264
Plaintiff:
James W. Schottel, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Chuck Grassley and Mike Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Schottel v. Trump et al
as 4:2025cv01265
Plaintiff:
James W. Schottel, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Chuck Grassley and Rick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nicholas Woodall v. Donald Trump, et al
as 25-5259
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Woodall
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, President, Supreme Court of the United States, Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House and others
NOHA v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2025cv01995
Plaintiff:
OLHA NOHA and OLGA DENOGGA
Defendant:
MOMMY TUBERVILLE, KATIE BOYD BRITT, LISA MURKOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 25-2202
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant:
I. JACQUEZ, Warden, D. SUH, Chaplain, B. CRAY, Counselor and others
Wilson et al v. Trump et al
as 4:2025cv00116
Plaintiff:
Amelia Curell, Kaylara Hoadley, Victoria Whitten and others
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Kim Reynolds, Brenna Bird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Durbin v. Biden et al
as 2:2025cv00013
Defendant:
Hakeem Jeffries, Phillip Swagel, Janet Yellen and others
Plaintiff:
John Paul Durbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-7862
Defendant:
J. WRIGHT, L. FRABONI, I. JACQUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
