Cases 1 - 10 of 1,118
Vauban International Bank Corporation et al v. EZBanc Corp et al
as 3:2024cv01199
Plaintiff:
Vauban International Bank Corporation, Tolomeo Bank International Corp, Tolomeo Bank Limited and others
Defendant:
EZBanc Corp, BSI Group LLC, Gregory Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Van Etten v. Child Support Enforcement Department of Revenue
as 4:2024cv40066
Petitioner:
Gregory James Van Etten
Respondent:
Child Support Enforcement Department of Revenue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AMSBRY v. RIDEOUT
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GREGORY AMSBRY
Defendant:
CHARLES A RIDEOUT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Strong v. Cambridge Health Alliance
as 1:2024cv10968
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
Cambridge Health Alliance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Strong v. North Suffolk Community Services
as 1:2024cv11030
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
North Suffolk Community Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Strong v. USPS
as 1:2024cv11034
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
USPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Strong v. YouTube(GOOGLE LLC)
as 1:2024cv11033
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
YouTube(GOOGLE LLC)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Strong v. Boston Police Department A-7
as 1:2024cv11031
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
Boston Police Department A-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Strong v. Xfinity Mobile Home
as 1:2024cv11032
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
Xfinity Mobile Home
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wadel v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10860
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wadel
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
