Cases 1 - 10 of 1,757
HANDY v. NORDO et al
as 2:2024cv01905
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HANDY
Defendant:
DETECTIVE PHILIP NORDO, DETECTIVE OHMARR JENKINS, DETECTIVE GREGORY SINGLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. BRIGGZ et al
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Dupree Williams
Defendant:
Gregory Briggz, C.O. Robinson, Savasia Caraballo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanderpool et al v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Roxie Vanderpool, Rickie Vanderpool, Allie Vanderpool and others
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Gregory Davis, Peter Derieux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. BRIGGZ et al
as 2:2024cv01813
Plaintiff:
DUPREE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GREGORY BRIGGZ, C.O. ROBINSON, SAVASIA CARABALLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZAPOLSKI v. GODEK et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. ZAPOLSKI
Defendant:
TROOPER RONALD GODEK, TROOPER KENT LOUCKS, GREGORY REICHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LEATHERS et al v. RUSSO et al
as 2:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Gregory Clay Leathers and Robert Jeffrey Rhodes
Defendant:
DAVID RUSSO, ZACHARY SAMS, Greene County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Briggs et al
as 4:2024cv00648
Petitioner:
Andre Brown
Respondent:
Gregory Briggs and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAUCUM v. IANNAMORELLI et al
as 2:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BAUCUM
Defendant:
ANTHONY IANNAMORELLI, RAYMOND DUPILKA, MATTHEW SCHIMIZZI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meinzinger v. Salvatore et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Brett Meinzinger
Defendant:
Gregory Salvatore, John an/or Jane Does #1-25 and ABC Corporations #1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
