Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013at01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gregory Christian v. David Ballard
as 13-7333
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY BRENT CHRISTIAN
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL V. MCGRAW, JR., TERESA WAID, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center and DAVID BALLARD
Respondent:
MARK A. BEZY, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary, Terre Haute and STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christian v. Ballard
as 3:2012cv03084
Petitioner:
Gregory Brent Christian
Respondent:
David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Robert Daniels, et al v. Atlantic Richfield Company, et al
as 09-35438
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT V. DANIELS, CONNIE M. DANIELS, DONALD R. SMITH and others
Defendant:
ANACONDA MINERALS COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellee:
TONI PHILLIPS, DONNA SUE PIERCE, ROBERT PIERCE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
