Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wiggins v. Ryle
as 1:2023cv00419
Petitioner:
Symphoni Vernice Wiggins
Respondent:
Assistant Warden Brammer and Gretchen Ryle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Curtis v. Ryle
as 1:2023cv00329
Petitioner:
Leslie Erin Curtis
Respondent:
United States of America and Gretchen Ryle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Isabell v. Ryle
as 1:2023cv00182
Petitioner:
Ann Margaret Isabell
Respondent:
Gretchen Ryle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Young v. Ryle
as 1:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
Antoinette Young
Respondent:
Gretchen Ryle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Frye v. Ryle
as 1:2023cv00016
Petitioner:
Keesha Frye
Respondent:
Gretchen Ryle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cofield v. Ryle et al
as 1:2022cv00571
Petitioner:
Edwina Cofield
Respondent:
Gretchen Ryle and Alderson Federal Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Meredith v. Ryle
as 1:2022cv00564
Petitioner:
Marquita Leigh Meredith
Respondent:
Gretchen Ryle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bandy v. Ryle
as 1:2022cv00208
Petitioner:
Shelley Phillips Bandy and Shelley Phillips Bandy Collins
Respondent:
Gretchen Ryle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Moler v. Lawson et al
as 6:2019cv00149
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Christopher Mabe, Ms. J. Free and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PITTS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
RANDALL PITTS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, KENDES ARCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
