Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Moore v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kevin Moore
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Glenn Bowles, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 24-1013
Plaintiff:
GLENN BOWLES, KENNETH FRANKS and ROBERT GARDNER
Defendant:
GRETCHEN WHITMER and DANA NESSEL
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Hope v. Brady et al
as 7:2023cv01677
Plaintiff:
Antonio DeVonne Hope, Sr
Defendant:
James Brady, Cecilia Quirindongo, Victoria Ann Valentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Right to Life of Michigan et al v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Right to Life of Michigan, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Gina Johnsen and others
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel and Jocelyn Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Williams v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2023cv01115
Plaintiff:
Rita Williams
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel, Frank G. Hillary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
