Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Campbell v. Atlanta Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv04435
Plaintiff:
Milton Campbell
Defendant:
Atlanta Police Department, Fulton County District Attorney, Greyhound Bus Lines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. A.C.D.C./Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv03904
Plaintiff:
Milton Campbell
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Fulton County, Atlanta Police Department, Fulton County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASSAR v. GREYHOUND BUS LINES
as 4:2016cv00762
Plaintiff:
JOAN VASSAR
Defendant:
GREYHOUND BUS LINES, DAVID LEACH and SHIRLEY JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Susa Nasa v. Greyhound Bus Lines, et al
as 12-10010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUSA NASA
Defendant - Appellee:
GREYHOUND BUS LINES, Corporate, QUICK PICK FOOD STORE, INC., TWO UNNAMED QUICK PICK FOOD STORE EMPLOYEES and others
Nasa v. Greyhound Bus Lines et al
as 1:2011cv03355
Plaintiff:
Susa Nasa
Defendant:
Greyhound Bus Lines, Quick Pick Food Store, Inc., Two Unnamed Quick Pick Food Store Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv61810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Williams et al(MAG+)
as 2:2010cv00011
Plaintiff:
Ellis Franklin
Defendant:
Charlie C. Williams, Greyhound Bus Lines and Robert C. Black, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fields v. Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc.
as 8:2009cv01085
Plaintiff:
Milliard W. Fields
Defendant:
Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holloman v. Greyhound Bus Lines
as 3:2008cv01215
Plaintiff:
Eric Wendell Holloman
Defendant:
Greyhound Bus Lines
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chaisson v. Greyhound Bus Lines
as 2:2008cv00133
Plaintiff:
Chris Chaisson
Defendant:
Greyhound Bus Lines
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
