Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Guerrero v. Terex USA, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv10246
Defendant:
Terex USA, LLC, Genie Industries, Inc. and United Rentals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eddy Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv12221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Guerrero et al v. 100 Percent Delicias Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv10066
Plaintiff:
Yakaira Guerrero, Arabelly Diaz and Yohanna Santos
Defendant:
Carlos Marte doing business as 100% Delicias Restaurant, CIVELIS MARTE De Los Santos doing business as 100% Delicias Restaurant, Derrick Crespo doing business as 100% Delicias Restaurant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Lugo-Guerrero v. USA
as 1:2021cv10221
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Lugo-Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10685
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv12392
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baez et al v. Town of Brookline et al
as 1:2017cv10661
Defendant:
Town of Brookline , Neil Wishinsky , Nancy Daly and others
Plaintiff:
Juana Baez , Cruz Sanabria , Rogelio Rodas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv12520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Nunez-Geurrero
as 1:2016mc91216
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Felix R. Nunez-Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Guerrero Franco
as 1:2016mc91007
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Carlos A. Guerrero Franco
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
