Cases 21 - 30 of 121
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAXTER v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS BAXTER
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, ROY COOPER, SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAXTER v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS BAXTER
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, ROY COOPER, SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan Mitchell v. Guilford County Detention Center
as 22-6463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MEDICAL STAFF, CORPORAL HALL and HERNANDEZ, STAFF MEMBER
TURNER v. AYISI et al
as 1:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TURNER
Defendant:
M. AYISI, DR. HAWK, OFFICER HARRINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
JORDAN N. MITCHELL
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, CORPRAL HALL and HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PICKETT v. GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2021cv00928
Plaintiff:
ARVETRA R. PICKETT
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEBANE v. EDEN POLICE et al
as 1:2021cv00850
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE
Defendant:
EDEN POLICE, GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, OFC. J. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. DENTIST et al
as 1:2021cv00830
Plaintiff:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
DENTIST, DISTRICT ATTORNEY (GUILFORD COUNTY), SHERRIF ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAUGHN v. DOCTOR GUILFORD COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2021cv00825
Plaintiff:
TARA JEAN VAUGHN
Defendant:
DOCTOR GUILFORD COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
