Cases 1 - 10 of 26
HEUSSMAN v. GARLAND et al
as 5:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
WAYNE GUNTHER HEUSSMAN
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, STEVEN DETTELBACH, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
NANEZ et al v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
as 2:2023cv05092
Plaintiff:
ALYSSIA NANEZ and CENTORIA GUNTHER
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wyatt v. Hauser et al
as 1:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Tariq Wyatt
Defendant:
Christina Hauser, Jane Doe #1, Capt. Dreher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brett v. (unreadable) et al
as 1:2019cv01161
Defendant:
Mike McGloal, Dermont Fishman, Robert Rochwell and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. BIDEN et al
as 2:2018cv04738
Defendant:
MONSIGNOR LYNN, BARRY KNIGHT, KEN BRETT and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamma Irradiator Service v. C&C Irradiator Service et al
as 4:2018cv01395
Plaintiff:
Gamma Irradiator Service
Counter Plaintiff:
Chad Gunther, Christopher Nostrand and C&C Irradiator Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORBIN v. HALLIGAN et al
as 1:2018cv00186
Defendant:
MR. CLARK, MS. LINDER, MS. GUNTHER and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. CORBIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ANEN v. POWELL TRACHTMAN, P.C. et al
as 2:2018cv02151
Plaintiff:
TAMALYN S. ANEN
Defendant:
POWELL TRACHTMAN, P.C. , POWELL, TRACHTMAN, LOGAN, CARRLE & LOMBARDO, P.C. , POWELL LEGAL GROUP, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MILLER et al v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2017cv00276
Plaintiff:
DARREN MILLER and DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
MARYBETH ANDERSON, MAX GOTTESMAN, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
