Cases 31 - 40 of 147
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01743
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Carrasco v. Ponce-Guzman
as 1:2021cv01555
Defendant:
Courtney Ponce-Guzman
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Carrasco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guzman v. New Mexico State Department of Cultural Affairs et al
as 1:2021cv00198
Defendant:
New Mexico State Department of Cultural Affairs (DCA) and City of Santa Fe
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Guzman Loera v. True et al
as 1:2021cv00428
Petitioner:
Joaquin A. Guzman Loera
Respondent:
B. True, Michael Carvajal and Monty Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00016
Plaintiff:
Richard Guzman and Devon Smith
Defendant:
General Motors LLC and TRW Automotive Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muradyan v. Guzman et al
as 1:2020cv03380
Defendant:
Anthony Guzman, 3053 Restaurant Group, LLC doing business as Lodo's Bar and Grill Westminster and MCSV HOLDINGS I, LLC
Plaintiff:
Artur Muradyan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sako-Peacock v. Guzman et al
as 1:2020cv01063
Defendant:
Vincent Guzman, Progressive Northern Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Valerie Sako-Peacock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Loma et al v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2020cv02827
Defendant:
Michael (I) Felsoci, Adolph Chavez, Jr., Michael (I) L. Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Mikel Whitney and Brian Loma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guzman-Dominguez v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00745
Plaintiff:
Jose Remberto Guzman-Dominguez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Romero-De Guzman, et al v. Barr
as 20-9540
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
KAREN ABIGAIL ROMERO-DE GUZMAN and KIMBERLY ABIGAIL GUZMAN-ROMERO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
