Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Royall v. The Sherwin-Williams Company et al
as 3:2026cv00631
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Adam Royall
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Royall v. The Sherwin-Williams Company et al
as 3:2026cv00355
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Adam Royall
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Royall v. The Sherwin-Williams Company et al
as 3:2026cv00056
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Adam Royall
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Royall v. The Sherwin-Williams Company
as 3:2025cv02577
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Adam Royall
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Royall v. The Sherwin-Williams Company
as 3:2025cv02455
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Adam Royall
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
JONES v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2025cv15680
Plaintiff:
JULIA JONES
Defendant:
AARON GABRIEL ADAMS, GERALD MICHAEL ADAMS, DOUG RUETHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Royall v. The Sherwin-Williams Company
as 3:2025cv02379
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Adam Royall
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Dawson et al v. Porch.com Inc et al
as 3:2024cv07974
Plaintiff:
Mark Anderson, Leo Anderson, Robert Allen and others
Defendant:
Matthew Ehrlichman, Porch.com Inc and GoSmith Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
(PC) Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Randolph Wilson, Michael Gonzalez, Randy Barcena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tawe v. AKA John Doe et al
as 4:2021cv01789
Defendant:
L. Thompson, T. Brock, H. Klawinsky and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ngeh Tawe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
