Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Clervrain et al v. Griffin et al
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ashly Carmelle Dorsainville, Fridelyne Maisoneuve and others
Defendant:
Antwaun Griffin, Isabella Casillas Guzman, Diedra Henry-Spires and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith, et al v. City of Boston
as 20-1691
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARTIN JOSEPH, KENNETH SOUSA, BRIAN KEITH LATSON and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TINKER and JOHN M. JOHNSON
Interested Party:
MA HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION
Defendant / Appellant:
BOSTON, MA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez Pizzaro et al v. Synectrust, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01147
Defendant:
Synectrust, LLC and Jack Hirsbrunner
Plaintiff:
Ana Maria Perez-Pizzaro and Israel Rivera-Gaddy
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Jack Hirsbrunner and Synectrust, LLC
Third_party_defendant:
Urayoan Camacho, DTE, LLC, Efren Gonzalez and others
Counter_claimant:
Jack Hirsbrunner and Synectrust, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Ana Maria Perez-Pizzaro and Israel Rivera-Gaddy
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Smith, et al v. City of Boston
as 16-8034
Plaintiff - Respondent:
BRUCE SMITH, PAUL JOSEPH, MARTIN JOSEPH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. JOHNSON and ROBERT TINKER
Defendant - Petitioner:
BOSTON, MA, Massachusetts
Interested Party:
MA HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gaddis et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv00504
Plaintiff:
Mary Gaddis, Mary Gaddis, Mary Gaddis and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gaddy v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv02445
Plaintiff:
Charles Gaddy, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R.Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
