Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Deville v. Sieveking et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
John Deville, Jr
Defendant:
Johnny Sieveking, Kobe Lacombe, Jordan Santoyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Nino
as 23-40385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Nino, Gage Rivas, Matthew Herrera and others
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rossum v. Kilgore Police Department et al
as 6:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Kevin Deyon Rossum
Defendant:
Kilgore Police Department, Officer Unknown Taylor, Officer Charles Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00941
Petitioner:
Tyler Gage Watson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Lamar County
as 4:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
Tyler Gage Watson
Respondent:
Lamar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Nino et al
as 2:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Andrew Nino, Gage Rivas, Matthew Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Lamar County
as 4:2022cv03685
Plaintiff:
Tyler Gage Watson
Defendant:
Lamar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03516
Petitioner:
Tyler Gage Watson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
