Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mitchell et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00609
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
George Mitchell, Robert Hendren, Ralph Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
King et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 7:2023cv05771
Defendant:
Clark-Reliance LLC, Crane Instrumentation & Sampling Pft Corp, Paramount Global and others
Plaintiff:
Richard D King and Lonie C King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Floyd et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv02840
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Gregory Floyd, William Paul Ernst, Larry Layne Eshleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Dunbar v. ABB Motors and Mechanical Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv04069
Defendant:
Howden North America Inc., Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. A Delaware Corporation doing business as Ingalls Shipbuilding formerly known as Northrop Grumman Ship Systems formerly known as Ingalls Shipbuilding, a division of Litton Systems, Inc., Velan Valve Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
James Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv01842
Plaintiff:
Paul E Cruise and Mary Ann Robertson
Defendant:
Armstrong International Inc, Schneider Electric USA Inc, Occidental Chemical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gage v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 6:2011cv03203
Plaintiff:
Harold Gage
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Burgess v. J Reuben Long Detention Center et al
as 1:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
Demond Derrick Burgess
Defendant:
J Reuben Long Detention Center and Officer Gage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
