Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv01085
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Linda Gail Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gail Rogers v. American Federation of Gov.
as 19-11191
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAIL ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, AFGE DISTRICT 5
Rogers v. American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, AFGE District 5
as 1:2018cv01676
Plaintiff:
Gail Rogers
Defendant:
American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, AFGE District 5
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Rogers-Ballard v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv02983
Plaintiff:
Fern Gail Rogers-Ballard
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers-Ballard v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as VAW/3:15-cv-00039
Plaintiff:
Fern Gail Rogers-Ballard
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Michael Gardner v. Holly Clemmons, et al
as 13-2149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GARDNER
Defendant - Appellee:
HOLLY F. CLEMMONS, GAIL ROGERS and TAMARA BIGGERS
Gardner v. Clemmons et al
as 2:2013cv02027
Plaintiff:
Michael Gardner
Defendant:
Holly F Clemmons, Gail Rogers and Tamara Biggers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
as 8:2010cv00783
Plaintiff:
Gail Rogers
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rogers et al v. Indymac Financial Services Inc.
as 1:2008cv02575
Plaintiff:
Marc Rogers and Gail Rogers
Defendant:
Indymac Financial Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
