Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Gray Casualty and Surety Company v. FSA Trucking Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Gray Casual and Surety Company and Gray Casualty and Surety Company
Defendant:
FSA Trucking Inc, 4G Express LLC, A&L Logistics Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Highland Trucking LLC et al v. Fleetmatics, a Verizon Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv01123
Plaintiff:
Jeb Express LLC, KKs Trucking LLC, Highland Trucking LLC and others
Defendant:
Fleetmatics, a Verizon Corporation, Verizon Connect Fleet USA LLC and Fleetmatics, a Verizon Corporation d/b/a Verizon Connect Fleet USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coggins v. Town of Jackson's Gap (MAG+)
as 3:2012cv00205
Plaintiff:
Gene Coggins
Defendant:
Town of Jackson's Gap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Wood Products, LLC v. Multitrade Rabun Gap, LLC
as 3:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
Scott Wood Products, LLC
Defendant:
Multitrade Rabun Gap, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Coggins v. Town of Jackson's Gap
as 3:2009cv00539
Plaintiff:
Gene Coggins
Defendant:
Town of Jackson's Gap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coggins v. Town of Jackson's Gap (MAG+)
as 3:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
Gene Coggins
Defendant:
Town of Jackson's Gap
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coggins v. Town of Jackson's Gap (MAG+)
as 3:2009cv00065
Plaintiff:
Gene Coggins
Defendant:
Town of Jackson's Gap
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coggins v. Town of Jackson's Gap (MAG+)
as 3:2008cv00974
Plaintiff:
Gene Coggins
Defendant:
Town of Jackson's Gap
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coggins v. Town of Jackson's Gap (MAG+)
as 3:2008cv00264
Plaintiff:
Gene Coggins
Defendant:
Town of Jackson's Gap
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
