Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,038
Crooks v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv06089
Plaintiff: David Crooks
Defendant: AW Chesterton Company, AO Smith Corporation, ABB Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Gardner Denver Inc v. Air Pacific Compressors Inc
as 2:2022cv07665
Plaintiff: Gardner Denver Inc
Petitioner: Atlas Copco Compressors LLC and Atlas Copco North America LLC
Defendant: Accurate Air Engineering, Inc., Air Pacific Compressors Inc doing business as Compressed Air of California and John Lague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BATES et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01441
Plaintiff: WARREN BATES and MARY LYNN BATES
Cross Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, BROOKWOOD VENTURES, L.P., BW/IP, INC. and others
Defendant: AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., ATWOOD & MORRILL CO., INC., AURORA PUMP COMPANY and others
Cross Claimant: ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., FLOWSERVE U.S. INC., GENUINE PARTS COMPANY d/b/a National Automotive Parts Association, a/k/a/ NAPA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Wohlfert v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv05040
Plaintiff: Wayne Wohlfert
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, ABB, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Stephen C. Peet v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv06672
Plaintiff: Stephen C. Peet
Defendant: Armstrong International, Inc., Aurora Pump Company, Cleaver Brooks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Susan Rogers v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 22-2592
Plaintiff / Appellant: SUSAN M. ROGERS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM R. ROGERS, III, DECEASED, AND WIDOW IN HER OWN RIGHT
Defendant / Appellee: AO SMITH CORP, A W CHESTERTON INC, ALLEN BRADLEY CO and others
Defendant: ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO, BEAZER EAST INC, formerly known as KOPPERS, BROUDY SUPPLY and others
JOHN FYNES, ET AL v. BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., et al
as 2:2022cv03398
Plaintiff: JOHN FYNES and MARYANN FYNES
Defendant: BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., Bayer Cropscience, INc. (f/k/a Aventis CropScience USA Inc., f/k/a Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company Inc., a/k/a Amchem Products, Inc.) unknown Aventis Cropscience USA Inc. unknown Am, CBS CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, F/K/A VIACOM, INC., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO CBS CORPORATION, A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, F/K/A WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, GOULDS PUMPS, INC. and others
Cross Defendant: BRAND INSULATIONS, INC., CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.,, CONWED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
DOUGHERTY et al v. A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv03204
Plaintiff: JAMES EDWARD DOUGHERTY, MICHELE A DOUGHERTY and JAMES EDWARD DOUGHERTY, III
Defendant: A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY, ABB, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Revitalizing Auto Communities Environmental Respon v. National Grid USA
as 22-1589
Plaintiff: Revitalizing Auto Communities Environmental Response Trust
Plaintiff / Appellant: Racer Properties LLC, Eplet, LLC and Eplet, LLC, not individually but solely in its representative capacity as Administrative Trustee of Revitalizing Auto Communities Response Trust
Defendant / Appellee: National Grid USA, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Carrier Corporation and others
Defendant: Center Circles LLC, Chrysler Group LLC, Aleris Partners LLC and others
Gardner Denver, Inc. v. Accurate Air Engineering, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv04408
Plaintiff: Gardner Denver, Inc.
Defendant: Accurate Air Engineering, Inc., John Lague, Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC and others
Consolidated Defendant: Air Pacific Compressors Inc from member case number 2:22-cv-07665-DSF (ASx) doing business as Compressed Air of California

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?