Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Pettigrew v. Rosenburg et al
as 1:2015cv01255
Defendant:
Lt Rosenburg, . Burkel, Dr Garlic and others
Plaintiff:
Carey C Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manzanales v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01103
Plaintiff:
Pedro Manzanales, Jr
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Pontiac Correctional Center, Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. State Of Illinois et al
as 1:2015cv02018
Plaintiff:
Eric Keith McKinney
Defendant:
State Of Illinois, Patrick Quinn, Bruce Rauner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamasula, Jr. v. Italian Rose Garlic Products, Inc.
as 9:2015cv80162
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Tamasula, Jr.
Defendant:
Italian Rose Garlic Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Bodin et al v. County of Santa Clara
as 5:2014cv04158
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bodin and Garlic City Skydiving, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thorpe v. Wilmington Housing Authority et al
as 1:2014cv00714
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Thorpe, Sr.
Defendant:
Wilmington Housing Authority and Juane Benjamin-Garlic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Buchanan et al
as 0:2014cv60429
Plaintiff:
Ralston Davis
Defendant:
Randolph Buchanan and Seafood Express Garlic Crab House, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pendleton Flour Mills LLC v. Garlic Jim's Famous Gourmet Pizza, Inc.
as 2:2014mc00008
Plaintiff:
Pendleton Flour Mills LLC
Defendant:
Garlic Jim's Famous Gourmet Pizza, Inc.
Garnishee:
KeyBank
Lipscomb v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv01545
Plaintiff:
Keon Lipscomb
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Randy S Pfister, . Shicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pendleton Flour Mills LLC v. Garlic Jim's Famous Gourmet Pizza, Inc.
as 2:2013cv01987
Plaintiff:
Pendleton Flour Mills LLC
Defendant:
Garlic Jim's Famous Gourmet Pizza, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
