Cases 1 - 10 of 433
Tafari v. Rucker, et al.
as 24-2842
Plaintiff:
RAS HEZEKIAH TAFARI
Defendant:
YVETTE RUCKER, JULIE RANDALL, GARRY MOLER and others
Maney, et al. v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 24-2715
Plaintiff:
PAUL MANEY, GARY CLIFT, THERON HALL and others
Defendant:
STATE OF OREGON, COLETTE PETERS, HEIDI STEWARD, ACTING DIRECTOR and others
Gill v. bluebird bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10803
Plaintiff:
Garry Gill
Defendant:
bluebird bio, Inc., Andrew Obenshain, Christopher Krawtschuk and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. ROCKAWAY BILLIARDS L.L.C. et al
as 2:2024cv01743
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
ROCKAWAY BILLIARDS L.L.C. doing business as ROCKAWAY BILLIARDS, PAUL SPAANSTRA and GARRY FULLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Gallardo
as 23-50878
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Garry David Gallardo
Matthews, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 23-3874
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARRY MATTHEWS, DOMINIC ROSS HUNN and JAMAR HEARNS, individually and as class representatives
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT and LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS
Crawford v. McDonough
as 24-1075
Claimant:
GARRY L. CRAWFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Lewis v. USA
as 23-30387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Garry L. Lewis and G. Lewis-Louisiana, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Stephen Murphy, Colonel and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
