Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Lathrop-Vance v. Croft et al
as 2:2020cv01926
Defendant:
Dr. Garth Gulick, Brad Cain, Wagner and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathon Lee Lathrop-Vance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Blewett et al
as 2:2020cv01996
Defendant:
Garth Gulick, Steven Shelton, John Vargo and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ha v. Gulick et al
as 2:2020cv01785
Defendant:
Dr. Garth Gulick, Adam Reynolds, John Does 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Ha and Thomas Ha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vandenberg v. Gulick et al
as 2:2020cv01599
Defendant:
Garth Gulick and State of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Alex Lee Vandenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Herrington v. Thomas Bristol, et al
as 20-35288
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN/JANE DOE, STEVE SHELTON, SYLVIA WILCOX, Registered Nurse at SRCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LEROY HERRINGTON
Defendant:
MIKE GOWER, AMY HUGHES and THERAPUTIC LEVEL OF CARE COMMITTEE
Carvajal-Echeagary v. Cain et al
as 2:2020cv00193
Plaintiff:
Jorge Carvajal-Echeagary
Defendant:
Dr. Garth Gulick, Brad Cain and Dr. DiGiulio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travis Warren v. Ole Hansen, et al
as 20-35053
Defendant:
DAVID CALDER, MD, LANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant / Appellee:
GARTH GULICK, JOHN BATTLE, NP and OLE HANSEN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS DAVID WARREN
Robison v. DiGiulio et al
as 3:2019cv02072
Defendant:
John and Jane Does #1 - #5, Byron Hemphill, Lisa Koltes and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Robison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv01081
Defendant:
Mr. Geeir, Colette S. Peters, Dr. Peng and others
Plaintiff:
Rico Carlos Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Patton et al
as 2:2019cv01195
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Wells
Defendant:
J. Bugher, Dr. Mark Patton, C. Dieter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
