Cases 1 - 10 of 3,780
Crabb v. Kulhan et al
as 4:2024cv04081
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
Gary Kulhan, Carly Rhoades and Daniel Teel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westfield Insurance Company v. Bozza et al
as 1:2024cv03596
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
Gary Bozza and Jose Medrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Titus Henderson v. Gary Hamblin, et al
as 24-1757
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
GARY HAMBLIN, TIM HAINES, Superintendent, RICHARD S. SCHNEITER and others
Titus Henderson v. Edward Wall, et al
as 24-1758
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
EDWARD WALL, GARY BOUGHTON, SARA MASON and others
Gary v. Elkhart County Work Release et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Tervarus L Gary
Defendant:
Elkhart County Work Release, Board of Directors, Helfan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary v. Elkhart County Work Release et al
as 3:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Tervarus L Gary
Defendant:
Elkhart County Work Release, Board of Directors, Helfan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abt, Gary v. Johnson, D. et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Gary P. Abt
Defendant:
D. Johnson, Jenna L. Parks and Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Comer v. Holliman et al
as 2:2024cv02083
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Comer
Defendant:
Rhonda Holliman, Regan Rodke, BN #518 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gary v. Elkhart County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Tekuarus L Gary
Defendant:
Elkhart County Sheriffs Department, Jeff Segal and Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
