Cases 1 - 10 of 38
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27190
Plaintiff:
GARY HOWARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOWARD JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23805
Plaintiff:
GARY HOWARD JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Khara Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv14431
Plaintiff:
Khara Inc. and Ground Works Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Evan Moore, Ewelina Dymek and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68269
Plaintiff:
GARY HOWARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howard v. MHT USA LLC et al
as 1:2021cv04570
Plaintiff:
Gary Howard
Defendant:
MHT USA LLC and Krones, Inc. (Wisconsin)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv48744
Plaintiff:
GARY HOWARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howard v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00569
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gary Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv29933
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GARY HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01881
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Gary Howard
as 15-11205
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GARY HOWARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
