Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Smith v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv03923
Plaintiff:
Gary L Smith
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gary Smith v. State of Arkansa
as 14-2111
Petitioner - Appellant:
Gary L. Smith
Respondent - Appellee:
State of Arkansas
Smith v. State of Arkansas
as 2:2013cv02245
Petitioner:
Gary L. Smith
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06262
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aukema v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC
as 12-5108
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Douglas Aukema, Patricia A. Aukema, Jesse Barnhart and others
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Thomas E. Armstrong, Roy R. Backus, Patricia A. Barney and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Chesapeake Appalachia LLC and Statoilhydro USA Onshore Properties, Inc.
Aukema v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC
as 12-5092
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Douglas Aukema, Patricia A. Aukema, Jesse Barnhart and others
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Thomas E. Armstrong, Roy R. Backus, Patricia A. Barney and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Chesapeake Appalachia LLC and Statoilhydro USA Onshore Properties, Inc.
Smith v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2012cv06090
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gary L. Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 12-2002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY L. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Gary Smith v. H. Ousley, et al
as 12-1841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY L. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
H. OUSLEY, Pharmacy Technician, USP Marion, B. CLAYTON, Pharmacist, USP Marion, M. WINKLMEIER, Health Services Administrator, USP Marion and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
