Cases 21 - 30 of 351
Newton v. Garza
as 1:2023cv01475
Petitioner:
Sye Newton
Respondent:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Trowell v. Garza
as 1:2023cv01474
Petitioner:
Vincent Trowell
Respondent:
Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reed v. Garza et al
as 1:2023cv01471
Petitioner:
Robert Reed
Respondent:
F. Garza and Lynn Leibovitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Miguel Garza-Guerra v. Warden Allenwood FCI
as 23-2581
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL GARZA-GUERRA
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI
Furando v. Garza
as 1:2023cv01350
Petitioner:
Joseph Furando
Respondent:
Warden Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rios v. Lubbock County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 5:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
John Gabriel Rios
Respondent:
Lubbock County Sheriff's Office, Lynn County Sheriff's Office, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kamal v. Garza
as 4:2023cv01210
Petitioner:
Hussain I Kamal
Respondent:
Warden Fernando Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Navarro-Rodriguez v. Garza
as 1:2023cv00884
Petitioner:
Marcial Navarro-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
De La Garza v. Lumpkin
as 23-20215
Petitioner / Appellant:
Albert De La Garza
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Garza v. Winden
as 1:2023cv00938
Petitioner:
Albert R. Garza
Respondent:
Matthew Winden and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
