Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04044
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Gibson v. General Dynamic Ordnance and Tactical Systems Inc.
as 8:2020cv01198
Defendant: General Dynamic Ordnance and Tactical Systems Inc.
Plaintiff: Mark Gibson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Richard G. Miro et al v. Aerojet General Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv02593
Defendant: Aerojet General Corporation, Jay Kim Engineering, Cowden Metal Specialties, Inc. and others
Petitioner: General Chemical Corporation, d/b/a Genlabs
Plaintiff: Georgia Espinoza, Jenna Miro, Karen Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Romines v. General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Inc.
as 3:2015cv05011
Plaintiff: John Dalton Romines
Defendant: General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
USA v. Schlumberger Technology Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00399
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Schlumberger Technology Corp. and General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Inc. v. Ministry of National Defense, Armaments Bureau, 205th Arsenal Republic of China
as 8:2007cv00580
Plaintiff: General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Ministry of National Defense, Armaments Bureau, 205th Arsenal Republic of China
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?