Cases 1 - 10 of 185
Gentry v. Maxey
as 24-20021
Plaintiff:
James H. Gentry
Defendant:
E. Maxey, Officer, A. Oliver, Officer and Bryan Collier
Gentry v. Lucas et al
as 6:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Colton Jacob Gentry
Defendant:
Warden Spencer R. Lucas and Sgt. Wendall J. Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard v. Parkland Memorial Hospital
as 23-10654
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gentry Stephen Leonard
Defendant / Appellee:
Parkland Memorial Hospital, Parkland Hospital Trauma Team, John Doe #3 and others
Gentry v. Maxey et al
as 4:2023cv01445
Plaintiff:
James Gentry
Defendant:
E. Maxey, A. Oliver and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keener v. John Doe
as 3:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dane Keener
Defendant:
John Doe, Assistant Warden Unknown Gentry, FSA Unknown Gladdis and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnum v. Grayson County et al
as 4:2022cv01060
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barnum
Defendant:
Grayson County, Tom Watt, Kerrye Ashmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard v. Parkland Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2022cv02658
Plaintiff:
Gentry Stephen Leonard
Defendant:
Parkland Memorial Hospital, Parkland Hospital Trauma Team, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Lumpkin
as 22-40680
Petitioner / Appellant:
Gentry Collins
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Gentry v. Lewis et al
as 6:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gentry
Defendant:
Officer FNU Lewis and Henderson County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00364
Petitioner:
Gentry Collins
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
