Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Evans v. Henry et al
as 5:2017cv03192
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles Henry, Paul Hardison, Hans Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Henry et al Do not docket in this case. See new case number 5:17-ct-3192-BO.
as 7:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles Henry, Paul Hardison, Hans Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Henry et al
as 5:2017ct03192
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles Henry , Paul Hardison , Hans Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Henry et al CASE OPENED IN ERROR. PLEASE SEE CORRECT CASE 5:17-CT-3192-BO.
as 7:2017ct00153
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles Henry, Paul Hardison, Hans Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Darden Restaurant et al
as 5:2017cv00347
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Darden Restaurant, Antoine Dwayne Sprtes, Tara Lorraine Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans v. Miller et al
as 5:2017ct03102
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Hans Miller, Frederick Jefferies, Milkeala Marmelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 6:2017cv00587
Plaintiff:
George R Evans
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Evans v. Groom, et al
as 7:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
George R. Evans
Defendant:
Michael Groom , City of Jacksonville, N.C. , Christopher Capps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Onslow County, N.C., et al -
as 7:2016cv00346
Plaintiff:
George R. Evans
Defendant:
Onslow County, N.C. , Hans Miller and Detention Officer Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Onslow County, N.C., et al
as 5:2016ct03267
Plaintiff:
George R. Evans
Defendant:
Onslow County, N.C. , Hans Miller and Detention Officer Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
