Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Carlson et al v. Hutchison, Incorporated et al
as 4:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Jeff Carlson and Daniel Calderon
Defendant:
Hutchison, Incorporated, Farm & Ranch Holdings, LLC, Farm & Ranch Casualty Corp. and others
Cross Defendant:
George "Buck" Hutchison, Heath C. Hutchison, Shover Blake Hutchison and others
Cross Plaintiff:
Logan Valley Sales Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Buck et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20769
Plaintiff:
Randall George Buck and Catherine Ann Buck
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Buck et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as OHN/1:13-dp-20769
Plaintiff:
Randall George Buck and Catherine Ann Buck
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
United Shockwave Therapies, LLC. v. Buck
as 1:2011cv00769
Plaintiff:
United Shockwave Therapies, LLC.
Defendant:
George Buck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Charles Texter v. Todd Merlina, et al
as 08-2020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES LEE TEXTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JEROME BOTCHIE, Pennsylvania State Police Officer, GEORGE BUCK, Pennsylvania State Police Officer, TODD MERLINA, Pennsylvania State Police Officer and others
Defendant:
JOHN R. WALKER, an individual, CAROL VAN HORN, an individual and COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY
Howell, et al v. Polk, et al
as 06-16418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ALLEN HOWELL, husband and PATTI HOWELL, wife
Defendant - Appellee:
SHEILA SULLIVAN POLK, Yavapai County Attorney, ROBERT REED, City of Prescott Police Chief, DAVID BENNER, City of Prescott Assistant Police Chief and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
