Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tokyo Gatson v. Bergen County Prosecutors Offi, et al
as 16-2725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOKYO GATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, MICHAEL FALOTICO, Bergen County Prosecutor's Office, KEITH SORIANO, Bergen County Prosecutor's Office and others
GATSON v. BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2015cv08124
Plaintiff:
TOKYO GATSON
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, MICHAEL FALOTICO, KEITH SORIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatson v. Bergen County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 2:2015cv07671
Plaintiff:
TOKYO GATSON
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, MICHAEL FALOTICO, KEITH SORIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
York College Legal And Compliance/EOC Officer/Sexual/Harassment Officer:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Officials And Business Agent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
York College Vice President And Responsible For Tyrone Forte:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gatson v. Bergen County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 2:2015cv03795
Defendant:
Bergen County Prosecutor's Office, County of Bergen, Honorable Liliana A. DeaVila-Silebi, PJ.CR and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Tokyo Gatson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GATSON v. BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2015cv03734
Plaintiff:
TOKYO GATSON
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, MICHAEL FALOTICO, KEITH SORIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SERRANO v. CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2011cv02051
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SERRANO
Defendant:
CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
