Cases 1 - 10 of 3,901
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of, Arkansas, State of, Iowa, State of and others
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Alabama, State of et al v. Cardona et al
as 7:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Alabama, State of, Florida, State of, Georgia, State of and others
Defendant:
Miguel Cardona and U.S. Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Brandon Morrall
as 24-11329
Petitioner:
In re: BRANDON MORRALL
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Tennessee, State of et al v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Tennessee, State of, Arkansas, State of, Alabama, State of and others
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
American Chemistry Council, et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
as 24-11206
Petitioner:
AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL and GEORGIA CHEMISTRY COUNCIL
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
In re: Carey Ross
as 24-11227
Petitioner:
In re: CAREY L. ROSS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1087
Petitioner:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of West Virginia, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Terrance DentIn re: Terrance Dent
as 24-11179
Petitioner:
In re: TERRANCE JUSTIN DENT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
In re: Elbert Walker
as 24-11154
Petitioner:
In re: ELBERT WALKER
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
