Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Freeman v. St. Clair, et al.
as 1:2018cv00621
Plaintiff:
Larry Freeman
Defendant:
Jack St. Clair, Steven Smith, Georgia Thomatos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric K'napp v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 17-15577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
K'napp v. Brown, et al
as 2:2014cv01620
Plaintiff:
Eric C.R. K'napp
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Correctional Health Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. St. Claire et al
as 1:2013cv01594
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bell
Defendant:
Jack St. Claire, Georgia Thomatos and Forster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. St. Claire et al
as 2:2013cv02039
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bell
Defendant:
Jack St. Claire, Georgia Thomatos and Forster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linnie Staggs, et al v. Doctor's Hospital of Manteca,, et al
as 13-16086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINNIE STAGGS, as administrator of the Estate of Robert E. Staggs, deceased and MELISSA STAGGS
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR'S HOSPITAL OF MANTECA, INC., IVAN D. CLAY, Warden, TIM VIRGA, Warden and others
Staggs et al v. Doctors Hospital of Manteca, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00414
Plaintiff:
Linnie Staggs and Melissa Staggs
Defendant:
Doctor's Hospital of Manteca, Inc., Ivan D. Clay, Tim Virga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acero v. Thomatos, et al.
as 1:2010cv01308
Plaintiff:
Steven Charles Acero
Defendant:
Georgia Thomatos, Edwin Banji, Robert Folsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. California Department of Corrections, et. al.
as 2:2007cv00788
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Martin
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Michael Fox, Louis Loanne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
