Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gerald Pabst v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-11039
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERALD EDMOND PABST
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Bentley v. Dennison
as 12-741
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Kevin Michael Bentley, Felix Tavares, James Johnson and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert J. Dennison, as former Chair, New York State Division of Parole (the Division) and in his individual capacity, Anthony G. Ellis, II, as former Executive Director of the Division and in his individual capacity, George B. Alexander, as former Chair and Chief Executive Officer of the Division and in his individual capacity and others
Pabst v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2011cv02311
Petitioner:
Gerald Edmond Pabst
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bentley et al v. Dennison et al
as 1:2011cv01056
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Bentley , Felix Tavares , James Johnson and others
Defendant:
Robert J. Dennison, Anthony G. Ellis, II, George B. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentley et al v. Dennison et al
as 1:2011cv01056
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Bentley , Felix Tavares , James Johnson and others
Defendant:
Robert J. Dennison , Anthony G. Ellis, II , George B. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentley et al v. Dennison et al
as 2:2011cv01056
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Bentley , Felix Tavares , James Johnson and others
Defendant:
Robert J. Dennison , Anthony G. Ellis, II , George B. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pabst v. Huff
as 3:2011cv00268
Petitioner:
Gerald Edmond Pabst
Respondent:
C. Wayne Huff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02285
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
