Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Boaz Pleasant-Bey v. Tennessee Dept of Correction, et al
as 20-6192
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN WALKER, DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, Commissioner, CRAIG JULLIAN, Assistant Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOAZ PLEASANT-BEY
Boaz Pleasant-Bey v. Tennessee Dept. of Correction, et al
as 19-5622
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN WALKER, Food Service Assistant Manager, DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, Commissioner, CRAIG JULLIAN, Assistant Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOAZ PLEASANT-BEY
Boaz Pleasant-Bey v. Tennessee Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 17-5396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOAZ PLEASANT-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNSON COUNTY, MOUNTAIN CITY TENNESSEE, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Drew Kirkman v. Gerald McAllister
as 16-5438
Petitioner - Appellant:
DREW DAVID KIRKMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
GERALD MCALLISTER, Warden
Jasper Vick v. R. Smith, et al
as 16-5037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASPER LEE VICK
Defendant - Appellee:
R. SMITH, Individual and Official Capacity, GEORGIA CROWELL, Individual and Official Capacity, J. BUCK, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Moore v. Centurion of Tennessee, LLC et al (PSLC3)
as 3:2015cv00526
Plaintiff:
Rendell Moore
Defendant:
Centurion of Tennessee, LLC, Derrick Schofield, Gerald McAllister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. McAllister
as 1:2015cv00100
Petitioner:
Randy Clayton Norman
Respondent:
Gerald McAllister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Centurion of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 3:2015mc00041
Plaintiff:
Rendell Moore
Defendant:
Centurion of Tennessee, LLC, Derrick Schofield, Gerald McAllister and others
Johnson v. McAllister
as 2:2015cv02576
Petitioner:
Telly Savalas Johnson
Respondent:
Gerald McAllister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Heard v. McAllister
as 3:2015cv00925
Petitioner:
Jimmy Heard
Respondent:
Gerald McAllister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
