Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Orpilla et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11289
Plaintiff:
Michael Orpilla, Miguel Quinones, Peter Panariello and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Scott, et al v. Dona Ana County Commissioners, et al
as 12-2063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARON SCOTT and DURYEA SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
DONA ANA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, DONA ANA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, GARY KING and others
Defendant:
DONA ANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY, ALLEN DAVIS, Individually, and in his capacity as Director of Dona Ana County Humane Society, DEANISE MARTA, Individually, and in her capacity as Director of Dona Ana County Humane Society and others
Parris v. The City of New York et al.
as 1:2011cv04215
Plaintiff:
Robert Parris
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Police Department, Geraldo Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne et al
as 1:2009cv05633
Plaintiff:
Marshall Payne, Andrew J Camarillo and Geraldo Perez
Defendant:
McKinley Calhoun, Marc Vanek, Nicolas Lesch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Scott v. County of Dona Ana et al
as 2:2009cv00797
Plaintiff:
Daron Scott
Defendant:
County of Dona Ana, Dona Ana County Commissioners, Dona Ana County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Babineaux et al v. Pilgrim International, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04610
Plaintiff:
Katie Alexis Babineaux, Katie Alexis Babineaux, Dwight Alexis, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Pilgrim International, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Perez v. State of Florida
as 1:2007cv21694
Plaintiff:
Geraldo Perez
Defendant:
State of Florida and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
