Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lau v. NYSARC Trust Services, Inc.
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
GILBERT LAU
Defendant:
DOROTHY ZYSKOWSKI, Director of Trusts, JAMIE HARLA, Team Leader-Trust Administrator, NYSARC TRUST SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01685
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Lau et al v. Wokumi et al
as 1:2023cv02438
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Lau, Joseph Barton and Jose Mercado
Defendant:
Wokumi, Tokyo Ichiban Foods, Wagamama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe v. Schick et al
as 1:2022cv06015
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Gilbert Lau
Defendant:
Hon. Stephen G. Schick, JSC, Bryan R. Kaplan, Esq., Priscilla Andrewski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lau et al v. Fauci et al
as 1:2022cv00436
Defendant:
The Estate of William Henry Gates III, JOHN DOE, Dr. Anthony Stephen Fauci and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Lau, Joseph Barton and Jose Mercado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06055
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lau v. Match.com et al
as 1:2013cv02938
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Lau
Defendant:
Match.com, Janice Mercer and Grace Addo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Lau v. Daylightpayday
as 1:2011cv09704
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Lau
Defendant:
Daylightpayday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
