Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv23865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Webvention LLC v. Giorgio Armani Corporation
as 1:2012cv00008
Plaintiff:
Webvention LLC
Defendant:
Giorgio Armani Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
In re: Webvention LLC ('294) Patent Litigation
as 1:2011md02294
Plaintiff:
Novartis Corporation, Furniture Brands International, Inc., HDM Furniture Industries, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Webvention Holdings LLC , Webvention , Adidas America Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Landstar System, Inc. et al , Landstar System Holdings, Inc. , Landstar System, Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
Webvention LLC , 20-20 Icovia Inc., Marie Claire/Hearst and others
Webvention LLC v. Giorgio Armani Corporation
as 2:2011cv00486
Plaintiff:
Webvention LLC
Defendant:
Giorgio Armani Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Card Activation Technologies Inc
as 1:2010cv04984
Plaintiff:
Card Activation Technologies Inc
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc., Giorgio Armani Corporation, Cache, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04662
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
